Archive for the ‘Kreskin’s Thought For The Week’ Category

o do with telepathy or my ability to perceive individual’s thoughts. Let’s get down to a basic truth….the President is the head of the military. I’m not questioning General McChrystal’s competency. He’s obviously an outstanding general. There’s a controversy as to whether or not President Obama has taken an unfair position against him. If we study history and look at this scenario objectively, I wonder this…what in the world possessed a general to allow a writer, who may or may not be extremely liberal, from Rolling Stone Magazine to join him and be present during his social or quasi-social activities. It really doesn’t make any sense at all.

I predict that in this issue Obama will come forth as a stronger figure. And I use history to support this. We can’t overlook the fact that in our nation today we have no sense of history, and certainly our students in school are given next to no appreciation of historic events, whether they be war or otherwise. The fact that after President Roosevelt passed away and Harry S. Truman, then Vice President, took over Roosevelt’s position, he found it necessary to bring back from overseas General Douglas MacArthur, who made it known, amongst other things, that in fighting communist expansion in Asia, massive U.S. retaliation was the answer. It was clearly against the position of our government at that time. He came back to the United States fired by Harry S. Truman. As a young high school student, I was immediately aware the very morning that the firing hit the news of a massive public condemnation of Harry S. Truman for getting rid of one of our historically truly great military generals. But as the weeks and months went by, the ill feeling against Mr. Truman changed. He made some extraordinary decisions in his time as President and is today considered by many one of the top 5 presidents in history. Somehow in retrospect the public began to admire and understand his position as the head of the military. I predict the same feeling regarding the firing of the general will add a plus to Obama’s position today.

The many inquiries Kreskin has received asking him how truthful BP Chief Executive Tony Hayward was in his testimony during the hearings on Capital Hill was for Kreskin clouded by another factor…namely, he sensed a need to discern how sincere and honest were the members of the House Investigations Committee in their pontificating. Kreskin has the feeling that the one investigator that was missing was the late Senator Joseph McCarthy.

If You Could Read Her Thoughts… Debrahlee Lorenzana

Posted by admin On June - 4 - 2010

If you could read her thoughts….Debrahlee Lorenzana, who filed charges that she was fired by her bosses at Citibank because of her sexy attractiveness and garb, has already won the case.

She’s gotten what she mainly wanted and that is the 17 ½ minutes of fame.

I can tell you now she is wallowing in all the public and media attention.

MAY 23, 2010 – What’s on My Mind: Movie Prices

Posted by admin On May - 23 - 2010

I cannot help but empathize with the North American public’s plight grappling with another price raise. In this case, not oil or fresh foods or the inevitable new taxes, but the dramatic increase of movie box office charges. Can we blame the movie chains, since it’s clear they’re capitalizing on the consumer’s willingness to dig deeper and deeper into their pockets, the clue being given by 3D. Now that movie prices in the spirit of the financial climate are going to be socking it to the public, with admissions as high as $20, and the extraordinary generosity of modern, sophisticated parents of paying for such, the bottom line is that the mental manipulation of the U.S. public is dramatically showcased by our current day politicians and now even weekly movie prices….that philosophy being:

“RAPE THE AMERICAN PUBLIC NO MATTER WHAT THEIR AGE.”

Regarding Elena Kagan’s nomination to United States Supreme Court by President Obama:

Already there are some suggesting borrowing my abilities, to wit Esquire, The Political Blog: Really, Mr. President? Elena Kagan?….

This latter issue, which is almost wholly absent from the national dialogue — “Hey, we have two major parties and one of them is deranged!” — certainly will not arise at her confirmation hearings.
Call me Kreskin“.

by Charles P. Pierce, May 10, 2010

I can sense that many Americans are concerned that this is the beginning of a domino effect after which could follow France and England and within three years the USA

Davey Crockett lives on in Texas

Posted by admin On March - 29 - 2010

Kreskin and the statue of blues performer Lightnin’ Hopkins in Crockett, TX.

Kreskin donning the racoon skin hat presented to him by the Piney Woods Fine Arts Association as a symbol of Davy Crockett, of which the town is named after.

crockett.jpg

crockett_1.jpg

Kreskin on Joey Reynolds’ Last Two Shows

Posted by admin On March - 29 - 2010

Regarding Joey Reynolds leaving WOR

Joey Reynolds is one of the greatest living American radio talk show hosts. I have worked with all the great late-night radio hosts, Joe Franklin, Long John Nebel, Barry Farber, John Wingate. I am witness to the amazing variety of guests from all walks of life and the remarkable live music entertainment content, Reynolds always has brought to the show. What is almost as singularly remarkable is that in the hundreds of hours I spent with Joey on the air, I’ve rarely seen him using a telephone. The man has an encyclopedic mind for almost every area of modern culture and its people.

I predict he will be picked up by another broadcast station with an even better time slot!

Kreskin on Joey Reynolds Show “Death”?

Posted by admin On March - 18 - 2010

Kreskin will share his special insight into the controversial game show (?) Game of Death. How real is it? Actors feigning pain or reality? Only Kreskin knows! Join him on The Joey Reynolds Show tonight at 1AM.

Love and Hypnosis, Kreskin Style, Huffington Post Article

Posted by kreskin On February - 15 - 2010

The Amazing Kreskin – Posted: February 11, 2010 11:10 AM

Love And Hypnosis

Actually, my equating equating hypnosis with love is not of my own origin. I have simply amplified on something that the legendary psychoanalyst Sigmund Freud espoused over a century ago. Namely that people in love, in deep love, in passionate love, have a pretty similar relationship to people who are under hypnotic influence.

In the early days of Freud, he was introduced to hypnosis by Breuer, who felt that people in this special mystical state could remember details better from past experiences, and therefore help Freud and the analyst get to the early seat of the emotional problem. But there were some unnerving experiences of the analysts, doctors, and therapists. Sometimes these patients, particularly women, would lunge forward out of their hypnotic condition and try to embrace the therapist, like they became “in love” for that moment. Or more, it was suggested that there were sexual factors involved in the relationship, and the “transference” of a special quality was building up between the therapist and the patient who was starting to feel the way that patient would with a person in their private life that they were deeply involved with. As Freud abandoned hypnosis, because he found it not necessary, the same relationships built up between the patient and the therapist.

When you fall in love, you set aside many of your barriers. You don’t really stop to analyze the assignments tomorrow and what you’re going to do about that chronic post-nasal problem, how you will get your homework done if you’re going for your education. No, you find the person you’re with is beginning to take on a mysterious and, yes, rather unscientific relationship with you. After all, would simply being touched arouse erotic feelings? Not necessarily, except look at the induction that you’ve gone through. Oh, you are not told to gaze into the eyes of the hypnotist. You are not told to relax and listen to slumberous words. You are not watching a rotating disc. There are other tools that are helping to bring about an extremely romantic, non-critical frame of mind and body. The quietness of eating dinner with soft lighting, the occasional touching of two glasses that may symbolize unconsciously something that’s clicking between you.

Even across the table, the occasional touch, long before one has left for a private living room or bedroom, because this is beginning long before outside circumstances have been completely removed, after all people can respond to the power of suggestion on stage if the hypnotist is unusually skillful, in spite of the noise and distractions. There’s something bringing you closer to your increasingly passionate companion. You may even take advantage of another way to harmonize with your partner by dancing with them, especially to romantic music, the swaying, the motion, the fact that the bodies are in synchronization. This, along with the thoughts between each other, and the words, tend to magnetically draw a person closer. What is interesting is unlike traditional hypnosis, both partners are becoming mesmerized, but I’ve said for many, many years, “it’s a wise hypnotist who knows who is hypnotizing whom”; and my opinion, in many cases the hypnotist is as much hypnotically influenced as the subject.

THE KEY IS SUGGESTION. People who are apparently hypnotized are responding to the power of suggestion. They really are not in a trance. They really are not asleep. In fact, they’re not in any special altered condition, in spite of what most stage hypnotists might suggest, let alone doctors, psychologists, etc. who propose to put people in a trance and activate some psychotherapy. The trance is BS. There is no trance. It is the fact that under certain conditions we could be so convinced of a set of ideas that it can bypass our reasoning. The people who are described as hypnotized are responding to ideas without analyzing the way so that their impact disappears. Remember, when mommy kisses Billy on the forehead, Billy having just walked in crying because he hit his head, mommy simply said ‘let me kiss the booboo’ and it will go away. Suddenly Billy stops crying and goes out to play. He is so reassured by his remarks, trusting them, that he ignores the pain that is still there, but by ignoring it he lessens the pain.

In the same way, is it not remarkable that we can watch a horror movie or read a Stephen King novel in a warm room and get goose bumps? Do we ever stop to think how remarkable it is that the way we think can alter even the surface of our skin? If we watched the movie and kept dissecting it, thinking about the camera men behind the camera, the people off to the side, the way the movie’s structured, we would not envelope ourselves in the story, and horror or fear would not touch us.

But then again, a fictional story has caused us to cry. You watch a tear-jerker motion picture. I, myself, can think of An Affair to Remember, and could not help but be in tears at the end of the movie. So in spite of common sense telling you that this is only a movie, it’s not really happening, no one had died, no one has left their loved ones, no one has been gravely hurt or incapacitated, because thinking that out would cause no reaction to the story, but by enveloping ourselves within it, we don’t even stop to analyze and we’ve trapped ourselves sufficiently with the dialogue, the movement of the characters, and the music, and we’re responding similarly to a supposedly hypnotized person who’s been told that they’re watching a movie that’s very sad, and within a minute the subject is crying on the stage.

Again, when you’re falling in love, you have dropped many of your guards, including your critical thinking. Of course, you can consciously strengthen the bond, and not by trying to observe or interpret some body language in all this new fangled, modern psychological clap trap. Psychology and its therapists and teachers go in cycles. It’s not dreams these days, it’s not childhood experiences, it’s body language. Leave that to the experts. Don’t drive yourself crazy trying to interpret or remember what certain movements mean, because taken out of context they mean beans and BS. It will only tend to interrupt your true rapport with someone.

Know if you’re going to get more deeply involved between the two of you, speak the person’s language, move the way they do, use some of the key words that they like to use when they’re expressing themselves. Not overly so, but from time to time, as it touches on greater meaning within them if you find that when you touch them, their expression is comfortable. And you get the feeling that they’re comfortable, then that area of touching can be repeated from time to time.

And if you’re really a master and fully at home with this process, you can remember the music that was played either at dinner or some particularly meaningful moment and reuse that music, play it again. After all, it tends to reawaken some of those same feelings, like a post-hypnotic suggestion. Let yourself move with the flow, and neither of you really leads the other. You guide each other simultaneously, until you really experience a true romance, where for the minutes and hours reasoning and analyzing are not important. But if you don’t feel that way, or you don’t feel the way your partner does, you’re only conning yourself. No, you don’t need any pendulums or watches or rotating discs, or a glaring eye, but sometimes you do need a hypnotic focal point. In this case, take advantage of what has a romantic symbolism, something in the shape of a heart, a box of candy, a broach, or a simple picture. Oh, yes, I repeat there is a gigantic similarity between hypnosis, true hypnosis, and love, true love.

Regarding if one can determine if someone is lying when he or she says ‘I Love You.’

Because you are in an uncritical frame of mind the same way the person you are enraptured with is, you tend not to think about this in a critical way. After all, if you’re going to analyze whether a person’s lying to you or not when they’re in love, you’ve got to change your framework, and you, yourself, at that point will not be any where near the same frame of mind that they are in. That’s a price to pay, because love is an expensive experience. Oh, you might later on when it is all over and you are not with the person, look back and remind yourself and relive mentally some of the experience listening if you can to the sound of the voice of the person when they spoke, and note if you detect something strangely different, or something when you look back upon it gives you an uneasiness when they said they loved you. That could be a signal when all is not what it’s cracked up to be. Keep in mind the next time you’re hypnotizing your partner, if it’s really working, that partner is also mesmerizing you…such is love.

ESPecially,
The Amazing Kreskin